Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100 outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100 is 3271 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100 - 35 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 31% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron 1000M - 193 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 8 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$121.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $121.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7469 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i3-12100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 60 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |