Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of FX-8320
- Up to 20% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - $102.02 vs $126.99
- Up to 13% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 7 3700X - $0.45 vs $0.52 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-8320 - 245 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7424 minutes ago
Buy for $126.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7425 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320 | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |