Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 3450 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of FX-8320
- Up to 20% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700 - $102.02 vs $127.00
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 30% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-8320 - 231 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 4% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-8320 - $0.55 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1298 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$127
80%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $127 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1298 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |