Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 2935 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of FX-8320
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X - $102.02 vs $175.95
- Up to 32% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen 7 5800X - $0.54 vs $0.79 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 18% better in Escape From Tarkov than FX-8320 - 222 vs 188 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7373 minutes ago
Buy for $175.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7373 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320 | vs | Ryzen 7 5800X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |