Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600GT is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of FX-8320
- Up to 22% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600GT - $102.02 vs $129.99
- Up to 13% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 5 5600GT - $0.45 vs $0.52 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-8320 - 251 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
251
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
87%
Price, $
$129.99
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for $129.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600GT |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |