Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3299 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of FX-8320
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $102.02 vs $254.00
- Up to 46% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i9-12900KF - $0.67 vs $1.25 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 34% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than FX-8320 - 203 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 24 vs 8 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7179 minutes ago
Buy for $254 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7179 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |