The FX-8320 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core Ultra 7 265K and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $191.97 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-8320
- Up to 65% cheaper – $102.02 vs $293.99
Advantages of the Core Ultra 7 265K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 8 threads
FX-8320 vs Core Ultra 7 265K
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
245
100%
Min 1% FPS
166
100%
Price, $
$293.99
34%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
47%
FX-8320 vs Core Ultra 7 265K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Core Ultra 7 265K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Core Ultra 7 265K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core Ultra 7 265K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$169.00 | MSRP | $394.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1851 |
| Vishera | Codename | Arrow Lake-S |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 20 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.5 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 30 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR5 @ 6400 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
