Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 4011 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of FX-8320
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - $102.02 vs $332.61
- Up to 65% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Core i7-14700K - $0.34 vs $0.97 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 16% better in Forza Horizon 4 than FX-8320 - 344 vs 296 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 28 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
344
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
35%
Price, $
$332.61
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $332.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320 | vs | Core i7-14700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |