The EPYC 7742 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10900X and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $1178.44 more expensive!
Advantages of the EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 128 vs 20 threads
Advantages of the Core i9-10900X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 71% cheaper – $475.00 vs $1653.44
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 165 vs 225 Watts
EPYC 7742 vs Core i9-10900X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
208
100%
Min 1% FPS
144
100%
Price, $
$475
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
100%
EPYC 7742 vs Core i9-10900X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7742 vs Core i9-10900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7742 vs Core i9-10900X in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7742
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.25 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
72%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
16%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7742 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Rome | Codename | Cascade Lake-X |
225 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
Performance | ||
64 | Cores | 10 |
128 | Threads | 20 |
2.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 GHz |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 19.25 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |