The EPYC 74F3 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i7-950. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 74F3
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the Core i7-950
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 130 vs 240 Watts
EPYC 74F3 vs Core i7-950 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 74F3
Mar 15th, 2021
Average FPS
187
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Average FPS
167
89%
Min 1% FPS
112
90%
Price, $
$271.91
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.62/FPS
100%
EPYC 74F3 vs Core i7-950 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 74F3 vs Core i7-950 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 74F3 vs Core i7-950 in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 74F3
Mar 15th, 2021
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
3%
Base Frequency
3.07 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.33 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 74F3 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-950 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2009 |
| $2,900.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
| Not Available | Codename | Bloomfield |
| 240 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
256 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
