The Core i7-950 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-10105F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $195.89 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-950
The Core i3-10105F is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i3-10105F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 72% cheaper – $76.02 vs $271.91
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
Core i7-950 vs Core i3-10105F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
187
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, $
$76.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Core i7-950 vs Core i3-10105F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-950 vs Core i3-10105F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-950 vs Core i3-10105F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.07 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
3.33 GHz
76%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-950 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $97.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
