Counter-Strike 2
1080p@180Hz·22:45 played
AlexisCouturasDaer4n·1h ago
Public4 Tips
151
FPSAverage
90
FPS1% Low
89%/64°C
42%/49°C
16 GB
75%usage
Core Ultra 7 265KF vs Xeon E5-1620 v4
The Core Ultra 7 265KF is much faster than the Xeon E5-1620 v4 on average across 100+ games and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $44.87 more expensive!
Core Ultra 7 265KF72% Score
- Up to 118% faster on average across 100+ games
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
- Up to 69% better value for money
- Up to 29% more expensive – $276.99 vs $232.12
Xeon E5-1620 v423% Score
- Up to 29% cheaper – $232.12 vs $276.99
FPS Comparison Across Popular Games
Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.
Specs & Benchmark Comparison
Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.
Base Frequencyhelp
Core Ultra 7 265KF has a 11% higher base clock.
Turbo Frequencyhelp
Core Ultra 7 265KF boosts 45% higher.
LGA1851
Sockethelp
LGA2011-3Arrow Lake-S
Codenamehelp
Broadwell-EPDesktop
Segmenthelp
DesktopNo Integrated Graphics
Integrated GPUhelp
No Integrated Graphics6400 MHz (DDR5)
RAMhelp
2400 MHz (DDR4)Overclockable
Overclock Supporthelp
Not OverclockableFrequently Asked Questions
compare_arrowsWhich is better, Core Ultra 7 265KF or Xeon E5-1620 v4?expand_more
The Core Ultra 7 265KF. It's 213% faster than the Xeon E5-1620 v4 on average across 100+ games, scoring 72/100 vs 23/100 in our gaming rating.
speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 7 265KF than Xeon E5-1620 v4?expand_more
213% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.
aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Core Ultra 7 265KF or Xeon E5-1620 v4?expand_more
The Core Ultra 7 265KF is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.
paidIs the Core Ultra 7 265KF worth buying in 2026?expand_more
It scores 72/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.
differenceWhat is the difference between Core Ultra 7 265KF and Xeon E5-1620 v4?expand_more
Performance: Core Ultra 7 265KF scores 72/100, Xeon E5-1620 v4 scores 23/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.
compressWill the Core Ultra 7 265KF or Xeon E5-1620 v4 bottleneck my PC?expand_more
Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.
upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Core Ultra 7 265KF or Xeon E5-1620 v4?expand_more
The Core Ultra 7 265KF is the stronger pick at 72/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.
Popular Comparisons
Ultra 7 265KF vs Ryzen 7 7800X3DUltra 7 265KF vs Ryzen 7 9700XUltra 7 265KF vs Ryzen 7 7700XUltra 7 265KF vs Ryzen 9 9900XUltra 7 265KF vs Ryzen 5 5500Ultra 7 265KF vs Ryzen 7 9850X3DUltra 7 265KF vs Ryzen 5 7600XUltra 7 265KF vs Ultra 5 245KUltra 7 265KF vs Ryzen 5 8500GUltra 7 265KF vs Ultra 5 245KFUltra 7 265KF vs Ryzen 5 5600Ultra 7 265KF vs Ryzen 5 4500Ultra 7 265KF vs Ryzen 5 7500X3DUltra 7 265KF vs i5-4590Ultra 7 265KF vs i5-4590SUltra 7 265KF vs i5-4670Ultra 7 265KF vs Ryzen 5 3500XUltra 7 265KF vs Ryzen 5 7500FXeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3DXeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 7 9700XXeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 7 7700XXeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 9 9900XXeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 5 5500Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 7 9850X3DXeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 5 7600XXeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ultra 5 245KXeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 5 8500GXeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ultra 5 245KFXeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 5 5600Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 5 4500Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 5 7500X3DXeon E5-1620 v4 vs i5-4590Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs i5-4590SXeon E5-1620 v4 vs i5-4670Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 5 3500XXeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 5 7500F