In Atomfall, the Core i9-9920X is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900X and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $249 more expensive!
Core i9-9920X
No clear advantages
Core i9-10900X
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 218 vs 215 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 months and 30 days newer – Oct 19, 2019 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 11 months and 30 days newer
- Up to 36% cheaper – $449.98 vs $698.95
- Up to 36% cheaper
- Up to 37% better value in Atomfall – $2.06 vs $3.25/FPS
- Up to 37% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-9920X vs Core i9-10900X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9920X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
215 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
99%
Price, $
$698.95
64%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
63%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.06/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-9920X vs Core i9-10900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-9920X vs Core i9-10900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-9920X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
83%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-9920X Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| $1,189.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA2066 |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR4 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
