In Atomfall, the Core i9-10900X is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $151 more expensive!
Core i9-10900X
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 5 days newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Oct 19, 2019
- Is 5 years and 5 days newer
- Up to 34% cheaper – $298.98 vs $449.98
- Up to 34% cheaper
- Up to 42% better value in Atomfall – $1.20 vs $2.07/FPS
- Up to 42% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 125 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900X vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
217 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
88%
Price, $
$449.98
66%
Value, $/FPS
$2.07/FPS
58%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900X vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900X vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
50%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
64%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
85%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2019 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
