In Atomfall, the Core i9-10900X is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 5 245KF and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $235 more expensive!
Core i9-10900X
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 5 245KF
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 5 days newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Oct 19, 2019
- Is 5 years and 5 days newer
- Up to 52% cheaper – $214.99 vs $449.98
- Up to 52% cheaper
- Up to 58% better value in Atomfall – $0.87 vs $2.07/FPS
- Up to 58% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 125 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900X vs Core Ultra 5 245KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
217 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
89%
Price, $
$449.98
47%
Value, $/FPS
$2.07/FPS
42%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$214.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900X vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900X vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
71%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2019 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $294.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
