Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 179 days older than the cheaper Core i9-10900X.
Advantages of Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield IV than Core i9-10900X - 424 vs 423 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-10900X
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $565.00 vs $667.41
- Up to 15% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-9900 - $1.34 vs $1.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900 - 20 vs 16 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $667.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 274 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
423
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$565
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 274 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9900 | vs | Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |