In Atomfall, the Core i9-7920X is slightly slower than the Core i9-13900KF. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $199 cheaper!
Core i9-7920X
- Up to 36% cheaper – $349.95 vs $549.00
- Up to 36% cheaper
- Up to 27% better value in Atomfall – $1.63 vs $2.23/FPS
- Up to 27% better value in Atomfall
Core i9-13900KF
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 16 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Sep 10, 2017
- Is 5 years and 16 days newer
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 125 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 11% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i9-7920X vs Core i9-13900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Average FPS
214 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
87%
Price, $
$349.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$549
63%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
73%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-7920X vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-7920X vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
50%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
46%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
76%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-7920X Sep 10th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2017 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| $1,199.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
