Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 3700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 3700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1646 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 3700X.
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Ryzen 7 3700X - 346 vs 315 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $129.29 vs $512.79
- Up to 72% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Core i9-14900F - $0.41 vs $1.48 per FPS
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
346
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
28%
Price, $
$512.79
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $512.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
315
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$129.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $129.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |