Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 795 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12600K.
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Core i5-12600K - 209 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600K - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $172.99 vs $512.79
- Up to 66% better value when playing Control than Core i9-14900F - $0.84 vs $2.45 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
209
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.45/FPS
34%
Price, $
$512.79
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $512.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
206
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$172.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $172.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |