Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 7600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 7600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 359 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 7600.
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Sea of Thieves than Ryzen 5 7600 - 284 vs 276 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $197.91 vs $512.79
- Up to 60% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i9-14900F - $0.72 vs $1.81 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
284
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.81/FPS
40%
Price, $
$512.79
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $512.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
276
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $197.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |