Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 7600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 7600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 109 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 7600.
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 7600 - 222 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $185.00 vs $459.00
- Up to 59% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900K - $0.85 vs $2.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6474 minutes ago
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6474 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900K | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |