Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 7600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 7600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 359 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 7600.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $185.00 vs $485.00
- Up to 61% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-14900F - $1.36 vs $3.46 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 7600 - 140 vs 136 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 357 minutes ago
Buy for $485 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 356 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 7600 | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 14th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raphael | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
5 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |