Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 5700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 5700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 176 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 5700X.
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 5700X - 136 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $144.32 vs $459.00
- Up to 64% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-13900K - $1.20 vs $3.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6344 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
120
88%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$144.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $144.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6344 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900K | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |