Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1173 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900X.
Advantages of Core i9-10900X
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $565.00 vs $849.99
- Up to 28% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i5-13400F - $6.28 vs $8.76 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Remnant II than Core i9-10900X - 97 vs 90 FPS
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
90
93%
Value, $/FPS
$6.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$565
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7485 minutes ago
Buy for $849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7484 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900X | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
165 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |