Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 987 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900K.
Advantages of Core i9-10900K
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 125 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 20% better in No Man's Sky than Core i9-10900K - 218 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $419.00 vs $525.00
- Up to 33% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-10900K - $1.92 vs $2.88 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900K - 32 vs 20 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $525 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 270 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
218
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$419
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $419 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 269 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900K | vs | Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |