Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the more expensive Core i9-13900KF on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 107 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-13900KF.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900KF - 225 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $419.00 vs $463.58
- Up to 11% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900KF - $1.86 vs $2.09 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 125 vs 150 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
225
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$419
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $419 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 263 minutes ago
Buy for $463.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 263 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900KS | vs | Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |