In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-9700T is slower than the Core i3-330M and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $295 more expensive!
Core i7-9700T
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 24% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 217 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 75% cheaper – $98.95 vs $394.28
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 80% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.45 vs $2.25/FPS
- Up to 80% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
175 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
80%
Price, $
$394.28
25%
Value, $/FPS
$2.25/FPS
20%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
40%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $323.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
