In Deathloop, the Core i7-9700T is slightly slower than the Core i3-330M and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $295 more expensive!
Core i7-9700T
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 228 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
- Up to 75% cheaper – $98.95 vs $394.28
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 76% better value in Deathloop – $0.43 vs $1.79/FPS
- Up to 76% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
220 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
96%
Price, $
$394.28
25%
Value, $/FPS
$1.79/FPS
24%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
228 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
171 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
40%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $323.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
