In Atomfall, the Core i7-9700T is faster than the Core i3-330M. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $295 more expensive!
Core i7-9700T
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall – 210 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 75% cheaper – $98.95 vs $394.28
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 71% better value in Atomfall – $0.54 vs $1.87/FPS
- Up to 71% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$394.28
25%
Value, $/FPS
$1.87/FPS
29%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
182 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
87%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700T vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700T
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
40%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700T Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $323.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
