In Atomfall, the Core i7-920 is slower than the Core i7-14700F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $226 cheaper!
Core i7-920
- Up to 74% cheaper – $77.44 vs $302.97
- Up to 74% cheaper
- Up to 67% better value in Atomfall – $0.41 vs $1.25/FPS
- Up to 67% better value in Atomfall
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall – 242 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 30% faster in Atomfall
- Is 15 years and 1 month newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Nov 17, 2008
- Is 15 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-920 vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Average FPS
186 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
77%
Price, $
$77.44
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
25%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
33%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-920 vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-920 vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
24%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
54%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-920 Nov 17th, 2008 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
