In Atomfall, the Core i7-920 is slower than the Core i3-14100F, it's also the same value for money, as it's only $18 cheaper!
Core i7-920
- Up to 19% cheaper – $78.56 vs $96.99
- Up to 19% cheaper
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall – 230 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall
- Is 15 years and 1 month newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Nov 17, 2008
- Is 15 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 58 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-920 vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Average FPS
186 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
139 FPS
80%
Price, $
$78.56
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
80%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-920 vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-920 vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-920 Nov 17th, 2008 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
