In Atomfall, the Core i7-920 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $221 cheaper!
Core i7-920
- Up to 74% cheaper – $78.36 vs $298.98
- Up to 74% cheaper
- Up to 65% better value in Atomfall – $0.42 vs $1.20/FPS
- Up to 65% better value in Atomfall
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 33% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Atomfall
- Is 15 years and 11 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Nov 17, 2008
- Is 15 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-920 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Average FPS
186 FPS
75%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
75%
Price, $
$78.36
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
26%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
35%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-920 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-920 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
53%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-920 Nov 17th, 2008 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
