In Atomfall, the Core i7-920 is slower than the Core i5-12400F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $101 cheaper!
Core i7-920
- Up to 56% cheaper – $78.56 vs $179.99
- Up to 56% cheaper
- Up to 46% better value in Atomfall – $0.42 vs $0.78/FPS
- Up to 46% better value in Atomfall
Core i5-12400F
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall – 228 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall
- Is 13 years and 1 month newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Nov 17, 2008
- Is 13 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-920 vs Core i5-12400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Average FPS
186 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
139 FPS
81%
Price, $
$78.56
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
228 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
171 FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
43%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
54%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-920 vs Core i5-12400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-920 vs Core i5-12400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
44%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
18 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-920 Nov 17th, 2008 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12400F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $174.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
