In Atomfall, the Core i7-13700K is slightly faster than the Core i9-10900X. However, it's the same value for money, as it's $60 more expensive!
Core i7-13700K
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall – 244 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Oct 19, 2019
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 125 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900X
- Up to 12% cheaper – $449.98 vs $509.88
- Up to 12% cheaper
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-13700K vs Core i9-10900X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$509.88
88%
Value, $/FPS
$2.08/FPS
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
217 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
89%
Price, $
$449.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.07/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-13700K vs Core i9-10900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-13700K vs Core i9-10900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
62%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
64%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
87%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-13700K Sep 27th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 27th, 2022 | Released | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| $409.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA2066 |
125 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR4 |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
