Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Core i3-7100
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $47.46 vs $512.79
- Up to 90% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-14900F - $0.21 vs $2.03 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-7100 - 252 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
223
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Buy for $512.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7100 | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |