Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Core i3-7100
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $47.46 vs $463.75
- Up to 89% better value when playing Control than Core i9-13900KF - $0.24 vs $2.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Core i3-7100 - 208 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
201
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
11%
Price, $
$463.75
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $463.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7100 | vs | Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |