Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1646 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Metro Exodus than Ryzen 5 3600 - 156 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $93.99 vs $512.79
- Up to 81% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Core i9-14900F - $0.64 vs $3.29 per FPS
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
156
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.29/FPS
19%
Price, $
$512.79
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $512.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
146
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $93.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |