In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-4330 is slightly faster than the Core i7-10700K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $211 cheaper!
Core i3-4330
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 181 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 55% cheaper – $169.95 vs $380.99
- Up to 55% cheaper
- Up to 58% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.93 vs $2.22/FPS
- Up to 58% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 54 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Core i7-10700K
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-4330 vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
181 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
100%
Price, $
$169.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
171 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
128 FPS
94%
Price, $
$380.99
44%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
42%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4330 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
