In Rust, the Core i3-4330 is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $211 cheaper!
Core i3-4330
- Up to 55% cheaper – $169.95 vs $380.99
- Up to 55% cheaper
- Up to 52% better value in Rust – $0.78 vs $1.61/FPS
- Up to 52% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 54 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Core i7-10700K
- Up to 9% faster in Rust – 236 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4330 vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
216 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
77%
Price, $
$169.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
236 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
62 FPS
100%
Price, $
$380.99
44%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
48%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4330 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
