In Ready or Not, the Core i3-4330 is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $210 cheaper!
Core i3-4330
- Up to 55% cheaper – $169.95 vs $380.00
- Up to 55% cheaper
- Up to 54% better value in Ready or Not – $0.54 vs $1.18/FPS
- Up to 54% better value in Ready or Not
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 54 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Core i7-10700K
- Up to 3% faster in Ready or Not – 320 vs 311 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Ready or Not
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer
Ready or Not FPS Calculator
Core i3-4330 vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
311 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
88 FPS
82%
Price, $
$169.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
320 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
107 FPS
100%
Price, $
$380
44%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
46%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4330 vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4330
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4330 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
54W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
