Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3089 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Core i3-4160
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $19.99 vs $744.99
- Up to 97% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.11 vs $3.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 54 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 23% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4160 - 222 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 32 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
180
81%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Buy for $744.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4160 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |