Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3375 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Core i3-4160
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $19.99 vs $426.84
- Up to 95% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i9-14900K - $0.12 vs $2.26 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Core i3-4160 - 189 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 32 vs 4 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
168
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
Buy for $426.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4160 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |