Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 2299 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Core i3-4160
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X - $19.99 vs $179.00
- Up to 88% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 7 5800X - $0.10 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-4160 - 217 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
199
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Buy for $179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4160 | vs | Ryzen 7 5800X |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |