In Deathloop, the Core i3-4130T is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $539 cheaper!
Core i3-4130T
- Up to 96% cheaper – $23.99 vs $563.41
- Up to 96% cheaper
- Up to 96% better value in Deathloop – $0.10 vs $2.29/FPS
- Up to 96% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 12% faster in Deathloop – 245 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130T vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
219 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
90%
Price, $
$23.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$563.41
4%
Value, $/FPS
$2.29/FPS
4%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130T vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130T vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130T Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
