In Deathloop, the Core i3-4130T is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 9600X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $170 cheaper!
Core i3-4130T
- Up to 88% cheaper – $23.99 vs $194.00
- Up to 88% cheaper
- Up to 87% better value in Deathloop – $0.10 vs $0.78/FPS
- Up to 87% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Ryzen 5 9600X
- Up to 12% faster in Deathloop – 246 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Deathloop
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer – Aug 08, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130T vs Ryzen 5 9600X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
219 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
89%
Price, $
$23.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 9600X
Aug 8th, 2024
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$194
12%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
13%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130T vs Ryzen 5 9600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130T vs Ryzen 5 9600X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
9%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 9600X
Aug 8th, 2024
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130T Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 9600X Aug 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Aug 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $279.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM5 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
