In Deathloop, the Core i3-4130T is slower than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $545 cheaper!
Core i3-4130T
- Up to 96% cheaper – $23.99 vs $569.00
- Up to 96% cheaper
- Up to 95% better value in Deathloop – $0.10 vs $2.14/FPS
- Up to 95% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 35 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
- Up to 21% faster in Deathloop – 265 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130T vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
219 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
83%
Price, $
$23.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
265 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
198 FPS
100%
Price, $
$569
4%
Value, $/FPS
$2.14/FPS
5%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130T vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130T vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
2%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130T Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 6th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM5 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
