In Deathloop, the Core i3-4130T is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $423 cheaper!
Core i3-4130T
- Up to 95% cheaper – $23.99 vs $447.16
- Up to 95% cheaper
- Up to 95% better value in Deathloop – $0.10 vs $1.83/FPS
- Up to 95% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop – 244 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130T vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
219 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
90%
Price, $
$23.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$447.16
5%
Value, $/FPS
$1.83/FPS
5%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130T Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
