Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100 is 808 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900X.
Advantages of Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 13% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-10900X - 641 vs 568 FPS
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $113.99 vs $565.00
- Up to 82% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-10900X - $0.18 vs $0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 60 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-10900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100 - 20 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
641
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$113.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $113.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
Buy for $565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-12100 | vs | Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 165 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |