Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 131 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105T.
Advantages of Core i3-10105T
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $89.99 vs $343.99
- Up to 70% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 5950X - $0.70 vs $2.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-10105T - 146 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105T - 32 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
129
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
Buy for $343.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105T | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |