Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 294 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105T.
Advantages of Core i3-10105T
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - $89.99 vs $143.57
- Up to 30% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-12400 - $0.57 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-10105T - 176 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105T - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
159
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7075 minutes ago
Buy for $143.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7076 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105T | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |